Genealogy of morals essay questions
On the other hand, the linguistic evidence is that the association of guilt with debt is very old and, fairly close to being culturally universal, although this evidence depends upon sources from the age of writing which only goes back so far millennia BC?
In what way has soul expanded over time, according to Nietzsche? Growing up in Germany, living in Switzerland and Italy, and earning an advanced degree in what we would now call the humanities, which would include study of religious texts from diverse traditions, Nietzsche was not only familiar with Protestantism, especially Lutheranism and Calvinism, and with Catholicism but also Buddhism, Hinduism, and Zoroastrianism, as well as the religious ideas of the Homeric and classical Greeks.
Nietzsche genealogy of morals essay 1
With what religious practices and ideas does N. Note Nietzsche's experimental, tentative approach, which is partly inspired by Socrates'. What would repayment of the "debt" consist in? Does this amount to a critique of all modern ethical systems? Was this change a voluntary one? For instance, in the Adam and Eve myth, "humanity" is seen as a constant: we were created in precisely the shape we have now, and we have always had the same purposes, drives, and wills. Here, we need remember see: essay one Nietzsche was last left squinting. Thus the central question that pertains is: what does debt; and its axiom credit; mean? Given that all animals already operate by instinct — and thus only have passive memory — can this really be where man learnt to make promises, actively remember them, and thus maintain a contract with his culture? The first of the three essays outlines two alternate structures for the creation of values, which is credited to masters and the other to slaves. What is there about priestly aristocracies that N. What is it not impossible to conceive? Such a person is further described in Thus, the sovereign conscience, eventually, ripens. It is true that the "Judaeans" of this period were socially dominated by their priestly elements, at least if we can assume that the books of the Hebrew Bible were respected during this period.
What question in particular should be asked? In Genealogy of Morals, Friedrich Nietzsche mentions that values and concepts have a history because of the many different meanings that come with it.
Genealogy of morals discussion questions
What "might one add"? See also What is it not impossible to conceive? The upshot of this seems to be "there is no goal" of historical progress. N clearly regards "the breeding evolving? Ressentiment and contempt differ in three significant ways. What diagnosis of present European civilization does N. This is the form their hatred for the masters takes. The two understandings of "origin" are neatly identified and contrasted by Foucault in his essay, "Nietzsche, Genealogy, History. In fact, this template of suffering; a balance of suffering perhaps; as having some kind of value, is nonetheless an artificial transposition over the otherwise senselessness of suffering designed into nature. How is the meaning of "good" transformed when it is opposed to "evil" rather than "good"? Friedrich Nietzsche aggressively reasons an oppositional interpretation by assigning culpability for the transposition of what he insists is the natural state of morality upon the ascension of Judeo-Christian religion to ruling prominence. Therefore, describing these core characteristics — of originating values — is the focus.
Why does N speak of "power over oneself and over fate" in this context? When our inherent sense of indebtedness. For what valuable experiences does it make room?
Given that all animals already operate by instinct — and thus only have passive memory — can this really be where man learnt to make promises, actively remember them, and thus maintain a contract with his culture?
Genealogy of morals essay questions
How does Nietzsche understand the origin of bad conscience? What first step was necessary in this process? From what will the "man of the future" of which N is speaking redeem us? Which party is the debtor, which the creditor? Closer to Nietzsche's time, Darwinism is anti-teleological. What point about the setting up of an ideal does N. Does he associate it with the master type or the slave type? What things are hard to see? Why is memory called "a counter-faculty"? Why does N claim that forgetting is "a strength"?
based on 70 review